Mexico to Take Legal Action Against US Construction Materials Giant, Vulcan, for Environmental Damage

The Mexican government’s moves against Vulcan has drawn accusations of “anti-business attitude[s] and rhetoric” from both sides of the US Senate. 

Mexico’s President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (otherwise known as AMLO) is causing yet more hand-wringing and consternation in the US business and lobbying community. On Tuesday he announced plans to file an international lawsuit against Alabama-based Vulcan Materials and its subsidiary in Mexico, Sac-Tun (formerly known as Calica), for the grave environmental damage its extraction of limestone has caused to the water quality and subsoil conditions.

Aerial photos give some idea of the scale of the damage. Vulcan and Sac-Tun have created a vast wasteland in the middle of verdant rainforest less than a kilometer from the Caribbean coastline. Even the business-friendly Mexican daily El Economista called it a “sinkhole of industrial proportions.”

Government of Mexico confirms closure of Sac-Tun excavation site outside Playa del Carmen - Riviera Maya News

“Imagine: they took away material to build highways in the United States, creating an ecological catastrophe and we are going to present an international complaint,” stated AMLO in his press conference from the National Palace, adding that the environmental damage has already affected the region’s famous cenotes and underground rivers. AMLO said he will take the case to national and international courts.

Vulcan is the largest construction materials producer in the United States. It has operations overseas, including underwater quarrying operations at its Sac-Tun site in Quintana Roo. Once excavated, the limestone is shipped to the US from a purpose-built port. Headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama, Vulcan Materials has been operating on Mexico’s Mayan Riviera since 1986, when it bought more than 4,000 hectares of coastal rainforest just 10 kilometers south of Playa del Carmen.

The company received mining licenses from a succession of Mexican governments. But things began to change in 2018, when Mexican authorities refused to allow quarrying at some of the sites due to the environmental damage being caused. In response, the company filed for an arbitration panel under the old North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), in which it is seeking damages of around $1.5 billion from the Mexican government.

“No More Impunity”

AMLO has emphasized his government will not issue permits that harm the Mexican population and its resources. Therefore, if Vulcan refuses to withdraw its lawsuit, the government will seek the support of influential multilateral institutions such as the United Nations. “Caring for the environment comes before financial gains,” AMLO said in February:

“If they say no and want to continue exploiting [resources] without authorization or continue suing the country for taking care of its environment, we are going to take our case to the UN. This is not an idle threat or a warning, we are simply stating that impunity is no longer allowed.”

As I reported in February, this is part of a broader trend of growing resource nationalism in Latin America that has global mining companies and their investors extremely concerned, especially as interest in the region’s unparalleled lithium deposits rises. Governments of lithium-rich countries in the region, including Mexico, want to make sure they (and hopefully by extension their voters) benefit from the lithium rush.

To that end, the AMLO government passed a new mining bill in April whose main goal is to ensure that lithium exploration, exploitation and use will be exclusively reserved for the Mexican state under a federal authority.

“We are going to protect Mexico’s lithium, the lithium of our generation and future generations, our children and grandchildren,” AMLO said at the time.

As many of AMLO’s opponents were desperate to point out, all of Mexico’s lithium stores already belong to the Mexican State — at least in theory. Article 27 of Mexico’s constitution holds that “the direct ownership of all natural resources of the continental shelf and the submarine shelf of the islands” is vested in the nation. But in practice, just about every government since NAFTA has awarded exceptionally generous concessions to foreign mining companies that have left behind them a vast trail of environmental devastation, human rights violations (including union busting) and corrupt practices.

Mexico’s new mining law has sparked fears that other countries in the region may do something similar. As the UK-based global risk and strategic consulting firm Verisk Maplecroft noted in August 2021, more and more countries are taking greater control of the revenues generated by the minerals and hydrocarbons produced within their borders:

Mexico stands out as seeing the largest increase in risk out of the 198 countries assessed by the RNI, driven by AMLO’s nationalist agenda that wields community and environmental arguments as justification for greater state involvement in the extractive sector. Worryingly for miners and energy firms, its performance is indicative of a wider regional trend. South America’s three largest economies, Brazil, Argentina and Colombia are also experiencing substantial negative shifts in the index.

Since coming to power in late 2018 AMLO’s government has rejected a permit for Odyssey Marine Exploration’s Don Diego phosphates seabed mining project in Baja California Sur due to concerns about the local wildlife, which has also led to an arbitration claim. It has said it will block Invecture Group’s Los Cardones open-pit gold project due to its inherent environmental risks. In fact, the AMLO Government has imposed a de facto ban on open-pit mining.

Mexican Shakedown

In February this year, the AMLO government unveiled plans to negotiate a resolution to its standoff with Vulcan. In exchange for Vulcan’s withdrawing of the lawsuit, the company would receive material resources and help from the government to convert the limestone quarry into a natural park or tourism attraction. It was a deal that Vulcan could hardly accept, given it has zero expertise or interest in tourism. But the alternative was to lose all rights over the land.

AMLO dispatched Mexico’s Ambassador to the US, Esteban Moctezuma, to Birmingham, Alabama, to try to twist the company’s arm. The message was simple: the mine’s activities must be terminated as they are damaging the region’s ecosystem. At the same time the AMLO government insisted the concession was not being revoked; it just had to be used for other, less environmentally harmful purposes.

Granted, mass tourism is hardly good for the environment but it is better than excavating for limestone meters under the water table. Also, as luck would have it, a new tourism development on the site would fit perfectly with AMLO’s signature infrastructure project, the Mayan Train, a 948-mile intercity railway that will traverse the Yucatán Peninsula, which itself has come under criticism for the environmental destruction it is causing…

Read the full article on Naked Capitalism

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s